The Insanity Quota

Barack Obama has no right to even be in the race for so many reasons that his very presence is a slap in the face to the Constitution. His policy of “redistribution of wealth” flies in the face of Capitalism. For the prior two years, the democratically controlled Senate and House has made every effort to achieve this and it has earned them a nine percent favorability rating. What is it that makes voters think that the same policy, enacted by Obama under the Executive Branch will look any different? This is insanity.

As the public becomes more and more exposed to Obama we find two characteristics that run common among his peers and associates. First, all of them are either radical Muslim or have a Communist pedigree. This is not a recent phenomenon for him. These far left relationships stretch all the way back to his birth and early schooling. Has anyone noticed

that his social peers, those the rest of us know as “friends” have not come forward to vouch for him? During the Democratic Convention when the candidate is painted in his most favorable light, no one could come forward to claim a valuable and heart felt relationship with Obama. Acceptance of this, by the voting public, is very sad and it is also a form of insanity.

McCain and his election committees are on the campaign trail doing everything they know to do in order to highlight McCain’s past. Obama and his committees are doing everything legally possible to conceal his. Who paid for his rather extensive education? Where was he really born? Does he have a valid birth certificate in compliance with constitutional law? Who are the people with whom he likes to associate? These are valid questions, not some concerted effort to discredit the man. American’s have a right to know who he is! Offering or supporting a candidate who desires to conceal his past is a form of insanity.

The whole situation lacks balance yet the oratory and distance from the policies of President Bush have made Obama a rock star. His appeal stretches from the very young to the very old and in most cases, he appeals to people with an agenda other than the betterment and continuance of the USA as it exists under the Constitution. An emotional vote or, at best, a rebellious vote for President is also a form of insanity.

Bill Clinton and Obama share some of the same traits. Neither will expose their background. Clinton has yet to disclose his medical records yet a casual observation of the man displays a nose that has seen serious abuse, probably through some form of drug use. Both were brought up in a single mother household who, try as she might, was unable to be both mother and father to the boy(s). Both are able to talk the talk with vigor and enthusiasm. Their skills as a speaker are second to none and have served each of them well in the absence of any true conviction for life. Asking for another Bill Clinton who, by virtue of his sexcapades in the Oval Office, has shown his true colors, is irrational. Ronald Reagan refused to enter the Oval Office unless properly dressed with a coat and tie out of respect for the place, he set the example. Clinton used it as a brothel. He made a vow to his wife and refused to honor it. What made the American people think he would honor his oath as President? His impeachment testifies to his character. Inviting another “ Clinton ” into the White House is insanity.

To quote Obama “You can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig.” Every voter that has been impressed by the Socialistic agenda Obama has proposed should take a long hard look in the mirror to see if they really want to forgo the freedoms that have been bought at such a high price for America.

Bookmark/Search this post with: